Industrial · Energy · Heavy Equipment

Your First Call When the Physics Get Real.

Most industrial and energy companies don't have a dedicated simulation team. When pressure vessels, thermal transients, rotating machinery, or code compliance go beyond what your generalist mechanical engineer can handle — we're your external simulation department. On-demand. Fixed-fee. No overhead.

Industrial Simulation Capability

Code complianceASME VIII · EN 13445 · IIW
Pressure vesselsFEA per ASME Div. 2
CFD capabilitiesFlow dist. + thermal
Structural codesEN 1993 · AISC LRFD
Engagement modelFixed-fee per project
Turnaround1–3 weeks typical

You don't have a CAE department. You shouldn't need one full-time.

Most industrial and energy companies have one generalist mechanical engineer who runs a linear FEA once a year, uses conservative safety factors calibrated in the 1980s, and defers to hand calculations when the geometry gets complex. This works — until it doesn't.

When it stops working: a pressure vessel nozzle under combined loading. A heat exchanger with thermal stress concentrations at the tube sheet. A rotating shaft with resonant frequencies near a forcing frequency. Flow maldistribution in a manifold that's reducing process efficiency by 15%. These problems require specialist analysis, but not a full-time specialist.

"The goal isn't to build a simulation capability you maintain permanently — it's to get the right analysis done for the specific problem in front of you, with documentation that holds up to regulatory scrutiny."

Situations where the generalist approach runs out.

  • Pressure vessel nozzle under combined pressure, thermal, and mechanical loads — hand calculation per ASME Appendix 2 is conservative and you're over the weight budget
  • Heat exchanger not meeting thermal performance target — flow distribution across the tube bundle is not uniform and you need CFD to prove it
  • Fatigue crack found at a welded joint — need a fitness-for-service assessment and remaining life prediction before the next inspection
  • Rotating shaft has a vibration issue — hand calculation suggests resonance is not a concern but the machine disagrees
  • Need ASME or EN code-compliant FEA for a regulator or insurer — the linear stress analysis approach you've been using doesn't satisfy the requirements
  • Power electronics enclosure has thermal failures — natural convection cooling is not working as designed but you can't characterize why without CFD
Services for Industrial & Energy

Analysis capabilities for the full industrial problem set.

Pressure Vessel & Nozzle FEA

Detailed FEA of pressure vessels, heads, nozzles, and attachments per ASME VIII Division 2 (Design by Analysis) and EN 13445-3 Annex B. Includes pressure + thermal + piping reaction loads. Protection against plastic collapse, local failure, buckling, and fatigue. Analysis report suitable for AHJ submission.

ASME VIII Div. 2EN 13445Nozzle loadsDBAAHJ-ready report

Fatigue Assessment & Fitness for Service

Remaining life assessment for components with known or suspected cracks. API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1 fracture mechanics approach. Weld fatigue assessment per IIW recommendations for structural steelwork. Inspection interval optimization based on crack growth prediction.

API 579 / FFS-1IIW fatigueFracture mechanicsLEFM / EPFMInspection intervals

Flow Distribution & CFD

Flow distribution in manifolds, headers, heat exchangers, and process equipment. Pressure drop prediction for pump sizing validation. Conjugate heat transfer for thermal management. Identifies the flow non-uniformity that reduces heat exchanger effectiveness without a thermal performance test.

Flow distributionCHTPressure dropManifold designProcess equipment
🌡

Thermal Management & Electronics Cooling

Natural and forced convection + radiation analysis for electronics enclosures, power conversion equipment, and industrial control cabinets. Junction temperature prediction to identify hotspot failures. Cooling system design optimization before prototype build.

Natural convectionDO radiationElectronics TjEnclosure cooling

Structural Steel Analysis

FEA for structural steelwork — platforms, lifting frames, supports, skid structures. Stress linearization per EN 13445 or ASME VIII for code compliance. Weld fatigue assessment per IIW for cyclically loaded structures. Connection and anchor bolt analysis.

EN 1993Stress linearizationIIW weld fatigueLifting framesSkid structures

Rotating Machinery — Vibration & Resonance

Natural frequency extraction and Campbell diagram construction for rotating shafts, impellers, and bladed discs. Critical speed identification. Forced response analysis to predict vibration amplitudes under operational excitation. Identifies the resonance that the hand calculation said wasn't there.

Critical speedsCampbell diagramForced responseImpeller NVH

Analysis that satisfies the codes your equipment must meet.

Industrial simulation isn't just about getting a stress number — it's about producing a result that satisfies the applicable pressure equipment directive, structural code, or welding standard. We work to the codes, not around them.

ASME VIII

Pressure Vessels — ASME

Division 1 and Division 2 (Design by Analysis). Elastic stress analysis and limit load analysis for protection against plastic collapse. Fatigue analysis per Annex 5.B.

Unfired pressure vessels · Reactor vessels
Heat exchangers · Piping systems
Nozzle and flange connections
EN 13445

Pressure Vessels — European

EN 13445-3 Annex B (Detailed Assessment) using stress categorization and linearization. Protection against progressive plastic deformation and fatigue per Annex 17.

PED-compliant equipment
High-pressure industrial vessels
Cyclic duty pressure components
IIW

Weld Fatigue Assessment

Structural stress approach (hot-spot) and effective notch stress method per IIW recommendations. FAT class assignment and damage accumulation for variable amplitude loading.

Welded structural steelwork
Pressure vessels with cyclic loading
Offshore and crane structures

Why simulation makes financial sense even for a single component.

Cost Avoidance Examples

Pressure vessel redesign caught in analysis rather than hydro-test failure €50K–200K avoided
Heat exchanger flow distribution fixed before fabrication rather than after performance test €20K–80K avoided
Resonance identified before installation rather than after machinery failure €100K–500K+ avoided
Fitness-for-service assessment extends inspection interval by 2 years €30K–120K per interval
Nozzle reinforcement optimized vs. conservative oversizing 10–25% material cost reduction

?Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need to have a CAD model ready?
No. We can work from 2D drawings, sketches, or dimensional specifications. We'll create the simulation geometry ourselves and confirm it with you before meshing. If you have CAD, even better — we'll simplify it for simulation purposes.
How do you handle confidentiality?
All project discussions are treated as confidential by default. We work with proprietary industrial designs daily. Formal NDAs are available immediately upon request and are a standard part of most engagements.
Can you produce a report for submission to a regulatory authority?
Yes. We structure analysis reports to meet the documentation requirements of ASME, EN pressure equipment directives, and applicable structural codes. If you have a specific AHJ or notified body requirement, share it during scoping and we'll confirm the format upfront.
We've never commissioned simulation before. Where do we start?
Start with a 30-minute scoping call. Describe the component, the loading, and the question you need answered. We'll tell you what type of analysis is appropriate, what information we need from you, and what a realistic scope and timeline looks like.

Structural qualification of a 29.5-tonne solar inverter station.

49+ load sub-cases. ASCE 7-22. 115 mph wind. Seismic zone. All passed. Per-column reactions delivered for foundation design.

225.8 MPa COLUMN REACTIONS (Fz)
96%
peak utilisation
Confidential · Solar OEM · ASCE 7-22 · Structural FEA

29.5-tonne containerised inverter — wind, snow, ice & seismic qualification for 500 MW PV plant

49+ load sub-cases across ULS and SLS combinations. Governing case: seismic at 225.8 MPa / 96% utilization. All columns in net compression — no hold-down anchors required. Per-column reaction tables ready for foundation engineering.

49+
Sub-cases
10
Column reactions
0
Hold-down anchors
Read case study →

Physics problem you can't solve with hand calculations?

Describe the component, the loading, and what you need to know. We'll tell you what analysis is appropriate and scope a fixed-fee study in a 30-minute call.

Discuss an Industrial Project →

Initial response within 24 hours · NDA available upon request · No simulation background needed to start the conversation